Survival, fidelity, and recovery rates of white-winged doves in Texas

Bret A. Collier, Shelly R. Kremer, Corey D. Mason, Markus J. Peterson, Kirby W. Calhoun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Management of migratory birds at the national level has historically relied on regulatory boundaries for definition of harvest restrictions and estimation of demographic parameters. Most species of migratory game birds are not expanding their ranges, so migratory corridors are approximately fixed. White-winged doves (Zenaida asiatica), however, have undergone significant variation in population structure with marked range expansion occurring in Texas, and range contraction in Arizona, during the last 30 years. Because >85% of white-winged dove harvest in the United States (approx. 1.3 million annually) now occurs in Texas, information on vital rates of expanding white-winged dove populations is necessary for informed management. We used band recovery and mark-recapture data to investigate variation in survival and harvest across 3 geographic strata for white-winged doves banded in the pre-hunting season in Texas during 2007-2010. We banded 60,742 white-winged doves, recovered 2,458 bands via harvest reporting, and recaptured 455 known-age birds between 2007 and 2010. The best supporting model found some evidence for geographic differences in survival rates among strata (A-C) in both hatch-year (juvenile; A = 0.205 [SE = 0.0476], B = 0.213 [SE = 0.0278], C = 0.364 [SE = 0.0254]) and after-hatch year (adult; A = 0.483 [SE = 0.0775], B = 0.465 [SE = 0.0366], C = 0.538 [SE = 0.251]) birds. White-winged doves had a low probability of moving among strata (0.009) or being recaptured (0.002) across all strata. Harvest recovery rates were concordant with estimates for other dove species, but were variable across geographic strata. Based on our results, harvest management strategies for white-winged doves in Texas and elsewhere should consider differences in population vital rates among geographic strata. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1129-1134
Number of pages6
JournalThe Journal of Wildlife Management
Volume76
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 12 2012
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
Acknowledged KAUST grant number(s): KUS-C1-016-04
Acknowledgements: The Texas Parks and Wildlife Migratory Game Bird Stamp, the Institute of Renewable Natural Resources at Texas A&M University, and the Texas A&M University System provided funding for this research. We appreciate the considerable support from Texas Parks and Wildlife field staff, Texas Parks and Wildlife volunteers, as well as Texas A&M University technicians, for their tireless efforts banding white-winged doves across Texas. B. A. Collier acknowledges partial support for his work from Award No. KUS-C1-016-04 made by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). We gratefully acknowledge L. Reitz and M. Frisbie with Texas Parks and Wildlife for their tireless management of the daily banding and survey operations over the course of our work. We also acknowledge T. W. Schwertner for his efforts initiating this project. We are indebted to J. Hines for his assistance structuring the mssrvrcv.exe executable to fit the specifics of our study and to J. L. Laake for advice on development of the companion R package wwdoBR. We appreciate detailed comments on a draft of this manuscript from T. A. Sanders.
This publication acknowledges KAUST support, but has no KAUST affiliated authors.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Survival, fidelity, and recovery rates of white-winged doves in Texas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this