Realism for scientific ontologies

Michel Dumontier*, Robert Hoehndorf

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Science aims to develop an accurate understanding of reality through a variety of rigorously empirical and formal methods. Ontologies are used to formalize the meaning of terms within a domain of discourse. The Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) is an ontology of particular importance in the biomedical domains, where it provides the top-level for numerous ontologies, including those admitted as part of the OBO Foundry collection. The BFO requires that all classes in an ontology are actually instantiated in reality. Despite the fact that it is hard to show whether entities of some kind exist or do not exist in reality (especially for unobservable entities like elementary particles), this criterion fails to satisfy the need of scientists to communicate their findings and theories unambiguously. We discuss the problems that arise due to the BFO's realism criterion and suggest viable alternatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationFormal Ontology in Information Systems
PublisherIOS Press
Pages387-399
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)9781607505341
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Publication series

NameFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Volume209
ISSN (Print)0922-6389

Keywords

  • Biomedical ontology
  • Philosophy of science
  • Realism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Realism for scientific ontologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this