Pseudogenes as a paradigm of neutral evolution

Wen Hsiung Li*, Takashi Gojobori, Masatoshi Nei

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

359 Scopus citations

Abstract

On the neutral mutation hypothesis1-3, the rate of nucleotide substitution is expected to be higher for functionally less important genes or parts of genes than for functionally more important genes, as the latter would be subject to stronger purifying (negative) selection2-4. On the other hand, selectionists believe that most nucleotide substitutions are caused by positive darwinian selection5,6, in which case the rate of nucleotide substitution in functionally unimportant genes or parts of genes 2,7 is expected to be relatively lower because the mutations in these regions of DNA would not produce any significant selective advantages. Kimura8 and Jukes9 have argued that the higher substitution rate observed at the third positions of codons than at the first two positions supports the neutral mutation hypothesis, as most third-position substitutions are synonymous and do not change the amino acids encoded, although others5,10 have discussed the possibility that third-position substitutions are subject to positive darwinian selection. Recently, Kimura 11 noted that the mouse globin pseudogene, ψα3, evolved faster than the normal mouse α1 gene, although he did not compute the substitution rate. Here, we present a method of computing the rate of nucleotide substitution for pseudogenes, and report that the three recently discovered pseudogenes show an extremely high rate of nucleotide substitution. As these pseudogenes apparently have no function, this finding strongly supports the neutral mutation hypothesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)237-239
Number of pages3
JournalNature
Volume292
Issue number5820
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1981

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pseudogenes as a paradigm of neutral evolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this