How complementary are epibenthic assemblages in artificial and nearby natural rocky reefs?

Susana Carvalho, Ana Moura, João Cúrdia, Luís Cancela da Fonseca, Miguel N. Santos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present study analyses the composition, structure and trophic function of epibenthic assemblages in two artificial reefs (ARs) 16 years after deployment and in nearby natural reefs (NRs), aiming at providing insights on the complementarity between both habitats. Current findings suggest that after 16 years the ARs (concrete blocks), located in southern Portugal, do not act as surrogates for NRs, as epibenthic assemblages differed between reef types in composition, structure and trophic function. NRs showed higher diversity and complementarity (i.e. beta-diversity) than ARs, evidencing higher redundancy. Higher heterogeneity within NRs was also evidenced by the multi-dimensional scaling analysis based on abundance, biomass and trophic composition. NRs presented higher abundance of molluscs and biomass of sponges, resulting in differences in the trophic function: suspension-feeding dominated the NRs, while within ARs there was an ascendency of carnivory. Although not acting as surrogates for NRs and provided that no adverse effects (e.g. establishment of non-native species) were detected, ARs may have a significant contribution for the increase of regional diversity, as evidenced by the highest complementarity levels observed between assemblages in both reefs. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)170-177
Number of pages8
JournalMarine Environmental Research
Volume92
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How complementary are epibenthic assemblages in artificial and nearby natural rocky reefs?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this