Comparison of Nonprecious Metal Cathode Materials for Methane Production by Electromethanogenesis.

Michael Siegert, Matthew D Yates, Douglas F Call, Xiuping Zhu, Alfred Spormann, Bruce E Logan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Scopus citations

Abstract

In methanogenic microbial electrolysis cells (MMCs), CO2 is reduced to methane using a methanogenic biofilm on the cathode by either direct electron transfer or evolved hydrogen. To optimize methane generation, we examined several cathode materials: plain graphite blocks, graphite blocks coated with carbon black or carbon black containing metals (platinum, stainless steel or nickel) or insoluble minerals (ferrihydrite, magnetite, iron sulfide, or molybdenum disulfide), and carbon fiber brushes. Assuming a stoichiometric ratio of hydrogen (abiotic):methane (biotic) of 4:1, methane production with platinum could be explained solely by hydrogen production. For most other materials, however, abiotic hydrogen production rates were insufficient to explain methane production. At -600 mV, platinum on carbon black had the highest abiotic hydrogen gas formation rate (1600 ± 200 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)) and the highest biotic methane production rate (250 ± 90 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)). At -550 mV, plain graphite (76 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)) performed similarly to platinum (73 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)). Coulombic recoveries, based on the measured current and evolved gas, were initially greater than 100% for all materials except platinum, suggesting that cathodic corrosion also contributed to electromethanogenic gas production.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)910-917
Number of pages8
JournalACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 26 2014
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
Acknowledged KAUST grant number(s): KUS-I1-003-13
Acknowledgements: We are indebted to John Cantolina of the Materials Science Center at Penn State University for help with ESEM and Hiroyuki Kashima and Yongtae Alm for technical assistance. This research was supported by the Global Climate and Energy Program (GCEP) and by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST, award KUS-I1-003-13).
This publication acknowledges KAUST support, but has no KAUST affiliated authors.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Nonprecious Metal Cathode Materials for Methane Production by Electromethanogenesis.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this