Clinical genomics expands the morbid genome of intellectual disability and offers a high diagnostic yield

S. Anazi, S. Maddirevula, E. Faqeih, H. Alsedairy, Faris Alzahrani, H. E. Shamseldin, Nitinkumar Patel, M. Hashem, Nofal Ibrahim, F. Abdulwahab, N. Ewida, H. S. Alsaif, H. Al Sharif, Widyan Alamoudi, A. Kentab, F. A. Bashiri, M. Alnaser, A. H. Alwadei, M. Alfadhel, W. EyaidA. Hashem, A. Al Asmari, Moussa Saleh, A. Alsaman, K. A. Alhasan, M. Alsughayir, M. Al Shammari, A. Mahmoud, Z. N. Al-Hassnan, M. Al-Husain, R. Osama Khalil, N. Abd Elmeguid, Alaa Masri, Raees Ali, T. Ben-Omran, P. Elfishway, Asmaa Hashish, A. Ercan Sencicek, M. State, A. M. Alazami, M. A. Salih, N. Altassan, Stefan Arold, M. Abouelhoda, S. M. Wakil, D. Monies, R. Shaheen*, F. S. Alkuraya

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

117 Scopus citations

Abstract

Intellectual disability (ID) is a measurable phenotypic consequence of genetic and environmental factors. In this study, we prospectively assessed the diagnostic yield of genomic tools (molecular karyotyping, multi-gene panel and exome sequencing) in a cohort of 337 ID subjects as a first-tier test and compared it with a standard clinical evaluation performed in parallel. Standard clinical evaluation suggested a diagnosis in 16% of cases (54/337) but only 70% of these (38/54) were subsequently confirmed. On the other hand, the genomic approach revealed a likely diagnosis in 58% (n=196). These included copy number variants in 14% (n=54, 15% are novel), and point mutations revealed by multi-gene panel and exome sequencing in the remaining 43% (1% were found to have Fragile-X). The identified point mutations were mostly recessive (n=117, 81%), consistent with the high consanguinity of the study cohort, but also X-linked (n=8, 6%) and de novo dominant (n=19, 13%). When applied directly on all cases with negative molecular karyotyping, the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing was 60% (77/129). Exome sequencing also identified likely pathogenic variants in three novel candidate genes (DENND5A, NEMF and DNHD1) each of which harbored independent homozygous mutations in patients with overlapping phenotypes. In addition, exome sequencing revealed de novo and recessive variants in 32 genes (MAMDC2, TUBAL3, CPNE6, KLHL24, USP2, PIP5K1A, UBE4A, TP53TG5, ATOH1, C16ORF90, SLC39A14, TRERF1, RGL1, CDH11, SYDE2, HIRA, FEZF2, PROCA1, PIANP, PLK2, QRFPR, AP3B2, NUDT2, UFC1, BTN3A2, TADA1, ARFGEF3, FAM160B1, ZMYM5, SLC45A1, ARHGAP33 and CAPS2), which we highlight as potential candidates on the basis of several lines of evidence, and one of these genes (SLC39A14) was biallelically inactivated in a potentially treatable form of hypermanganesemia and neurodegeneration. Finally, likely causal variants in previously published candidate genes were identified (ASTN1, HELZ, THOC6, WDR45B, ADRA2B and CLIP1), thus supporting their involvement in ID pathogenesis. Our results expand the morbid genome of ID and support the adoption of genomics as a first-tier test for individuals with ID.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)615-624
Number of pages10
JournalMolecular Psychiatry
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical genomics expands the morbid genome of intellectual disability and offers a high diagnostic yield'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this