A theoretical comparison among model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods

Gerard Schuster*, Min Zhou

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Model-based redatuming and correlation-based redatuming methods are theoretically compared to one another. A correlation-based redatuming method uses natural phase information in the data to time shift the weighted traces so that they appear to be generated by sources (or recorded by geophones) shifted in location. In this paper, we show that all of the redatuming methods are based on a common formula. From this formula, we can assess the relative weaknesses and strengths of each method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSociety of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005
PublisherSociety of Exploration Geophysicists
Pages2374-2377
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)9781604236101
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Event75th Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005 - Houston, United States
Duration: Nov 6 2005Nov 11 2005

Publication series

NameSociety of Exploration Geophysicists - 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005

Conference

Conference75th Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG 2005
CountryUnited States
CityHouston
Period11/6/0511/11/05

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A theoretical comparison among model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this